The three types of debate
- Lincoln-Douglas Debate (LD): Named after the famous congressional debates of Abraham Lincoln and Stephen
Douglas, this category is largely based on values and ethics. There are two sides to every resolution, Affirmative and Negative.
The Affirmative debater must 'affirm' the topic of resolution, or show why it must be upheld. The Negative, means just the
opposite; they must 'negate' the resolution, or show why it is faulty. The resolutions, and hence arguments, usually involve
ethical and moral issues. Heavy emphasis on logic and philosophy.
- Cross Examination Debate (aka Team or Policy Debate): Just as in LD, there are two sides to every resolution.
Unlike LD, where there is a single debater, policy debate is made of an Affirmative team of two debaters against a Negative
team of two. Policy resolutions are typically matters of "policy" and require statistical and concrete evidence. Therefore
policy usually requires more research and evidence, but since you have a partner, the burden is shared. You must be able to
work well with your partner and enjoy the thrill of battle to do well in this category.
- Parliamentary Debate (Congress): The setup and design of H.S. Congress is much like Congress at the state
and federal level. You are given bills and resolutions (in the form of legislation) on which you debate. Speeches are three
minutes long and sometimes involve cross-examination. These contestants are usually interested in politics. Speeches are often
done impromptu (on the spot) and the research burden is relatively low compared to Policy and LD. Unfortunately Congress isn't
offered at every tournament, so most debaters pick it up as an alternative event when they can't do Policy or LD. Some people
though focus solely on Congress.
|